Thank you for your interest in submitting a comment for the review of
God Wars II.
The form for making your submission is provided below, if you have
previously submitted reviews or comments and have already read this you
may skip ahead to the submission form. If this is your
first review/comment we recommend that you read these guidelines carefully.
A valid email address is required. Upon submission, your comments will
be mailed to the email address you specified. You must return this
confirmation email in order to approve of your submission.
Please supply as much factual information as possible to support the
position of your comments, in response to the specified review.
Absolutely no profanity of any kind will be acceptable. Your comments
must be 'clean' enough for a child to read.
Comments submitted with excessive spelling and/or grammatical errors
will be returned for correction. Minor cases will be corrected by TMC.
A review may be requested removed at any time provided it has no comments
attached to it, once a review has
comments attached to it this option is inelligible.
These guidelines may be changed at any time.
You are commenting on the following review
Reviewed Mud: God Wars II |
Review Submitted By: Ragnar
Author Status: Player
Began on God Wars II: september of 2006
I've said on the mud for quite a while now that I would write a
review, and yet it just never happened. So here it is in all of its
My character name on the mud is Ragnar, and I've been playing
Godwars2 for about 6 years. Well, since mid-2006 anyway. So, I feel I
have a fairly good view of the mud and how it has progressed over a
period of time. As a result, I thought I would write a review focusing
not on the mud mechanics, but rather on the social mechanics. That is,
I have found that all reviews for godwars2 seem to focus on the
combat, the coordinate based movement and so on, as they rightly
should. These are extremely important and innovative mechanics that
have kept me and countless other players around for years. But, when I
look at a mud, mechanics are the surface, but what truly determines
whether or not I stay is the social mechanics, or, how players
interact with one another and how the staff interact with the players.
That's what I'll try to address in this review, and I'll try to do
it reasonably objectively.
Player/player dynamics One of the most interesting aspects of gw2 is
the fact that there are no explicit rules. Help rules specifically
tells you that common sense and a certain amount of critical thinking
will tell you what ought and ought not be done. But there are no hard
policies, hardcoded rules, bans or anything of the sort. This has had
a few affects, both positive and negative. Negatively, this leads to
the obvious: people feel that they are entitled to do whatever they
want. Which really, they are. This means they can be quite abusive,
but merely be disagreeable in relation to other players, not
explicitly to the rules. However, this has, in large, been dealt with.
The positive aspect of having no rules is the way in which these types
of people are dealt with. Simply put, we as the player base have, over
time, come to an agreement on a set of implicit rules. It's a
flexible, malleable, and inconstant and subject to change system, but
it's been here for close to 7 years, and the players as a whole
generally seek to enforce them. Such obvious rules as, 'don't
spamkill newbies,' and 'don't ignore game breaking bugs.' But also
less obvious rules, like: 'try to help newbies if you have the
experience,' and, in respect to said newbies, 'be patient and
intelligent about how you learn to play the mud.' I personally find
that this system that we have developed, though perhaps flawed in some
ways, is superior to any set of admin chosen rules, because it not
only was decided on by the community as a whole, but also can change
easily and doesn't require admin intervention. This manifests itself
in a variety of ways as well. For example, on many muds, there are
designated newbie helpers, who will help a newbie even if they are
impatient, belligerent and coarse. On gw2, almost every single player
will go out of their way to help a newbie, but we have no actual
obligation to do so. This means that when we get that stray newbie who
is impatient and unwilling to listen to advice, we are under no
restrictions, and generally don't even bother. This, combined with
the steep learning curve, affectively means we are a game free of
angry teenagers and people who lack the patience to learn and the
intelligence to read helpfiles. Perhaps this makes the mud and the
player’s elitist? I can't really answer that objectively, but I
will say that godwars2 conversations are often harsh, uncensored and
coarse, but they are also the most intelligent, thoughtful and
logically sound conversations I have found on a mud to date. So, this
has its positives and negatives as I have said. But if you enjoy a mud
where intelligence and hard work actually pays off, then we might be
right for you. If you are impatient, easily offended and unlikely to
take advice, then perhaps it's not. Note though that if you decide to
try us, I would advise at least glancing at our website:
http://www.godwars2.org It has valuable information that may help you
from the start.
Admin/player dynamics. The second element to social dynamics on a mud
that I look for are admin to player. That is, how do the admin respond
to player suggestions, how do they interact with the players, and how
fair and objective are they. On this, I can definitively say there are
no negatives. KaVir, the only coder and primary staff member, is one
of the best, if not the best, admin I have ever had the pleasure of
mudding under. I say this not because I have been on his mud for so
long, but rather because I find his method of player interaction
extremely affective. Basically, KaVir has a close relationship with
the mud players, as opposed to the distant one characteristic of most
muds. When he is logged on, he talks with the players about anything
and everything, and I have never seen him ignore or refuse to answer a
question. Similarly, I would say three quarters of the changes made to
the mud are player suggested, and he draws them from the entirety of
the base rather than from a few players like in some muds. If a newbie
has a good suggestion, it will be added, or at least considered. If
the suggestion isn't workable, KaVir is in the habit of explaining
why, and even giving the player a chance to rethink and resuggest the
change. What this leads to on a social level is that KaVir is not
often viewed as an enforcer. He's not viewed as a player certainly,
but the way in which players interact with him allows for a feeling of
player involvement, and means that those player enforced rules
discussed above are not contrary to the implementer's philosophy,
because we know what his focus for the game is, and where he's trying
to take it. We develop our player dynamics accordingly, and, as a
majority, work to further those goals. Finally, KaVir is very fair. In
those rare cases in which player rules are insufficient and admin
action must be taken, he considers all sides, from what I have seen.
Discussion is accepted and responded to, and he is far from a
dictator. I would go so far as to say he does not enjoy or even
remotely want to enforce admin rules, and as a result acts more like a
facilitator for enforcing rules than anything. It works, ultimately.
Godwars2, to quote a forum thread I have long since forgotten, is
similar to a study on sociology. How a group of people will develop
their own society and culture when no rules are at first present. We
have done so, I would say, and I would also say that it works very
well. I have enjoyed godwars2 immensely, and fully intend to continue
as a very active player into the foreseeable future. I hope you give
us a try. We always have room for more.